Read online or download the bibliography.
Publication entries combine repeated references to the same work. Additional reading is included where a lineage or comparison needs context.
Publications and selected reading
Inclusion identifies a source, not agreement with its conclusions or proof of NDT’s claims. Passage-level references remain available in the source crosswalk below.
Beal, B. L. (2018). Raskolnikov’s confession: A Dostoevskian model of moral psychology [Doctoral dissertation, Emory University].
Open source ↗Beal, B. (2020). What are the irreducible basic elements of morality? A critique of the debate over monism and pluralism in moral psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 273–290.
Open source ↗Beal, B. (2021). The nonmoral conditions of moral cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 34(8), 1097–1124.
Open source ↗Beal, B., & Gogia, G. (2021). Cognition in moral space: A minimal model. Consciousness and Cognition, 92, Article 103134.
Open source ↗Beal, B. (2022). The polyphony principle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, Article e222.
Open source ↗Beal, B., & Rottman, J. (2024). Nonmoral beliefs are better predictors of moral judgments than moral values [Submitted manuscript; project-held version].
Open source ↗Beal, B. (2025a, January 20). The is-to-ought model of moral cognition. Bree’s Substack.
Open source ↗Beal, B. (2025b, January 31). On the relation between moral philosophy and moral psychology. Bree’s Substack.
Open source ↗Beal, B. (2026). A thousand Ramanujans. Bree’s Substack.
Open source ↗Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Basil Blackwell. Cited passage: §33, p. 60.
Open source ↗Aquinas, T. (1920). Summa theologiae (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). New Advent, online reproduction. Cited passage: I–II, question 94, article 2.
Open source ↗Aristotle. (n.d.-a). On the motion of animals [De motu animalium] (A. S. L. Farquharson, Trans.). Internet Classics Archive. Cited passage: part 7.
Open source ↗Aristotle. (n.d.-b). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Online text hosted by Boston University. Cited passages: books I–II.
Open source ↗Arpaly, N. (2003). Unprincipled virtue: An inquiry into moral agency. Oxford University Press. Cited chapter: “Moral worth,” pp. 67–116.
Open source ↗Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1157–1188.
Open source ↗Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., Askell, A., Kernion, J., Jones, A., Chen, A., Goldie, A., Mirhoseini, A., McKinnon, C., Chen, C., Olsson, C., Olah, C., Hernandez, D., Drain, D., Ganguli, D., Li, D., Tran-Johnson, E., Perez, E., … Kaplan, J. (2022). Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI feedback [Preprint]. arXiv.
Open source ↗Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Open source ↗Batson, C. D., Klein, T. R., Highberger, L., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1042–1054.
Open source ↗Bentham, J. (n.d.). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. University of Texas at Austin, online text. Cited passage: chapter I, §II.
Open source ↗Crimston, D., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653.
Open source ↗Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69.
Open source ↗Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1052–1075.
Open source ↗Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without principles. Oxford University Press.
Open source ↗Davidson, D. (2006). Intending. In E. Lepore & K. Ludwig (Eds.), The essential Davidson (pp. 122–137). Oxford University Press. (Original essay published 1978.)
Open source ↗Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1–2), 1–37.
Open source ↗Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429–452.
Open source ↗Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2), 321–357.
Open source ↗Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., & Pezzulo, G. (2017). Active inference: A process theory. Neural Computation, 29(1), 1–49.
Open source ↗Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 239–249.
Open source ↗Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development (with a new letter to readers). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1982.)
Open source ↗Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press.
Open source ↗Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.
Open source ↗Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619.
Open source ↗Gray, K., & Pratt, S. (2025). Morality in our mind and across cultures and politics. Annual Review of Psychology, 76, 663–691.
Open source ↗Gray, K., MacCormack, J. K., Henry, T., Banks, E., Schein, C., Armstrong-Carter, E., Abrams, S., & Muscatell, K. A. (2022). The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(6), 1199–1222.
Open source ↗Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
Open source ↗Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.
Open source ↗Halpern, J. Y., & Pearl, J. (2005). Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(4), 843–887.
Open source ↗Hart, H. L. A., & Honoré, T. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Open source ↗Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time: A revised edition of the Stambaugh translation (J. Stambaugh, Trans.; D. J. Schmidt, Rev. & Foreword). State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1927.)
Open source ↗Held, V. (1995). The meshing of care and justice. Hypatia, 10(2), 128–132.
Open source ↗Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., Critch, A., Li, J., Song, D., & Steinhardt, J. (2021). Aligning AI with shared human values. International Conference on Learning Representations. arXiv:2008.02275.
Open source ↗Herman, B. (1993). The practice of moral judgment. Harvard University Press. Cited chapter: “On the value of acting from the motive of duty,” pp. 1–22.
Open source ↗Horty, J. F. (2012). Reasons as defaults. Oxford University Press.
Open source ↗Hume, D. (n.d.). A treatise of human nature. Hume Texts Online. Cited passages: 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.8, and 3.1.1.27; SBN pp. 414, 417, and 469–470.
Open source ↗Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (A. W. Wood, Ed. & Trans.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1785.)
Open source ↗Kant, I. (2012). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor & J. Timmermann, Eds. & Trans.; 2nd ed.; C. M. Korsgaard, Introduction). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785.)
Open source ↗Kleiman-Weiner, M., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017). Learning a commonsense moral theory. Cognition, 167, 107–123.
Open source ↗Kumar, V. (2016). The empirical identity of moral judgment. The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(265), 783–804.
Open source ↗Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251.
Open source ↗Levinas, E. (1991). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. (French original published 1961; English translation first published 1969.) Cited section: “Ethics and the face,” p. 198.
Open source ↗Levine, S., Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Cushman, F. (2026). Resource-rational contractualism: A triple theory of moral cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 49, Article e133.
Open source ↗Lord, E., & Sylvan, K. (2020). Prime time (for the basing relation). In J. A. Carter & P. Bondy (Eds.), Well-founded belief: New essays on the epistemic basing relation (pp. 141–173). Routledge.
Open source ↗Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Penguin Books. Cited passage: chapter 1, §2, p. 17.
Open source ↗Makinson, D., & van der Torre, L. (2007). What is input/output logic? Input/output logic, constraints, permissions. In G. Boella, L. van der Torre, & H. Verhagen (Eds.), Normative multi-agent systems (Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Vol. 07122, pp. 1–12). Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
Open source ↗Markovits, J. (2010). Acting for the right reasons. The Philosophical Review, 119(2), 201–242.
Open source ↗McCain, K. (2012). The interventionist account of causation and the basing relation. Philosophical Studies, 159(3), 357–382.
Open source ↗Much, N. C., & Shweder, R. A. (1978). Speaking of rules: The analysis of culture in breach. In W. Damon (Ed.), New directions in child development (pp. 19–39). Jossey-Bass.
Author’s bibliography identifying the chapter ↗Neta, R. (2015). Basing is conjuring. Minds Online.
Open source ↗Neta, R. (2019). The basing relation. The Philosophical Review, 128(2), 179–217.
Open source ↗Nichols, S. (2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84(2), 221–236.
Open source ↗Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 481–518.
Open source ↗Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75.
Open source ↗Ramezani, A., & Xu, Y. (2025). Moral association graph: A cognitive model for automated moral inference. Topics in Cognitive Science, 17(1), 120–138.
Open source ↗Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Clarendon Press. Cited passage: chapter 2, p. 28.
Open source ↗Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cited passage: chapter 5, p. 189.
Open source ↗Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70.
Open source ↗Searle, J. R. (1964). How to derive “ought” from “is.” The Philosophical Review, 73(1), 43–58.
Open source ↗Shweder, R. A. (1992). Ghost busters in anthropology. In R. G. D’Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 45–58). Cambridge University Press.
Open source ↗Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). University of Chicago Press.
Open source ↗Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–172). Routledge.
Open source ↗Silva, P., Jr. (2015). Does doxastic justification have a basing requirement? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(2), 371–387.
Open source ↗Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Wheatley, T. (2014). Are moral judgments unified? Philosophical Psychology, 27(4), 451–474.
Open source ↗Sliwa, P. (2016). Moral worth and moral knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(2), 393–418.
Open source ↗Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
Open source ↗Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81.
Open source ↗Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). The importance of moral construal: Moral versus non-moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions. PLOS ONE, 7(11), Article e48693.
Open source ↗Wainryb, C. (2004). “Is” and “ought”: Moral judgments about the world as understood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(103), 3–18.
Open source ↗Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Basil Blackwell. Cited passages: §§65–67.
German text, later collected edition ↗Wright, R. W. (1985). Causation in tort law. California Law Review, 73(6), 1735–1828.
Open source ↗Austin, M. W. (n.d.). Divine command theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Cited section: §4d. Retrieved September 7, 2026.
Open source ↗Mack, E. (2026, June 3). Robert Nozick’s political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Cited section: §2. Retrieved September 7, 2026.
Open source ↗
Source crosswalk · 77 passage-level source records
A source identifier refers to a particular quotation or claim in the project’s comparison records. Several identifiers can therefore lead to the same publication. Additional contextual reading does not create new comparison records.
| Source | Publication | Passage or location |
|---|---|---|
| S01 | Aristotle, n.d.-a | Part 7 |
| S02 | Hume, n.d.-a | 2.3.3.3; SBN p. 414 |
| S03 | Makinson & van der Torre, 2007 | Paper-level reference |
| S04 | Searle, 1964 | Paper-level reference |
| S05 | Dung, 1995-a | Definition 20, p. 329 |
| S06 | Bentham, n.d. | Chapter I, §II |
| S07 | Kant, n.d. | Formula of Humanity; Academy 4:429 |
| S08 | Ross, 1930 | Chapter 2, p. 28 |
| S09 | Aristotle, n.d.-b | Books I–II |
| S10 | Held, 1995 | Paper-level reference |
| S11 | Scanlon, 1998 | Chapter 5, p. 189 |
| S12 | Mack, 2026 | §2 |
| S13 | Aquinas, n.d. | I–II, question 94, article 2 |
| S14 | IEP, Divine Command Theory | §4d; secondary account of Adams |
| S15 | Dancy, 2004 | Chapter 1, p. 7 |
| S16 | Graham et al., 2011 | p. 366 |
| S17 | Schein & Gray, 2018-a | p. 32 |
| S18 | Turiel, 1983-a | Chapter 4, p. 61 |
| S19 | Curry, Mullins & Whitehouse, 2019 | Paper-level reference |
| S20 | Rai & Fiske, 2011-a | p. 58 |
| S21 | Kleiman-Weiner, Saxe & Tenenbaum, 2017 | Author manuscript, p. 2 |
| S22 | Friston et al., 2017 | Paper-level reference |
| S23 | Bai et al., 2022 | Preprint-level reference |
| S24 | Hendrycks et al., 2021 | Paper-level reference |
| S25 | Beal, 2020 | Article-level reference |
| S26 | Beal, 2021 | Article-level reference |
| S27 | Beal & Gogia, 2021 | Article-level reference |
| S28 | Beal, 2022 | Commentary-level reference |
| S29 | Beal, 2018 | Dissertation-level reference |
| S30 | Beal, 2025a | Essay-level reference |
| S31 | Beal, 2025b | Essay-level reference |
| S32 | Beal, 2026 | Essay-level reference |
| S33 | Herman, 1993 | “On the value of acting from the motive of duty,” p. 21 |
| S34 | Arpaly, 2003 | “Moral worth,” p. 72 |
| S35 | Markovits, 2010 | p. 202 |
| S36 | Sliwa, 2016 | p. 393 |
| S37 | Hart & Honore, 1985 | Book-level reference |
| S38 | Wright, 1985 | p. 1774 |
| S39 | Halpern & Pearl, 2005 | Paper-level reference |
| S40 | Levine et al., 2026 | Manuscript, p. 13 |
| S41 | Ramezani & Xu, 2025-a | p. 120 |
| S42 | Pollock, 1987 | p. 484 |
| S43 | Horty, 2012 | Publisher abstract |
| S44 | Bakhtin, 1984 | Chapter 1, p. 6 |
| S45 | Mackie, 1977 | Chapter 1, §2, p. 17 |
| S46 | Anscombe, 1957 | §33, p. 60 |
| S47 | Davidson, 1978 | 2006 collection, p. 132; original essay 1978 |
| S48 | Hume, n.d.-b | 3.1.1.27; SBN pp. 469–470 |
| S49 | Hume, n.d.-c | 2.3.3.8; SBN p. 417 |
| S50 | Haidt & Joseph, 2004 | p. 60 |
| S51 | Graham et al., 2013 | p. 63 |
| S52 | Schein & Gray, 2018-b | p. 32 (source record lists p. 33) |
| S53 | Turiel, 1983-b | Chapter 4, p. 64 |
| S54 | Rai & Fiske, 2011-b | p. 58 |
| S55 | Ramezani & Xu, 2025-b | §5.1 |
| S56 | Dung, 1995-b | Definition 7, p. 327 |
| S57 | Kant, 1785 | Section I, shopkeeper; Academy 4:397 |
| S58 | Nichols, 2002 | Paper-level reference |
| S59 | Wittgenstein, 1953 | §§65–67 |
| S60 | Beal & Rottman, 2024 | Submitted manuscript, 2024 |
| S61 | Cushman & Young, 2011 | Paper-level reference |
| S62 | Van Bavel et al., 2012 | Paper-level reference |
| S63 | Sinnott-Armstrong & Wheatley, 2014 | Abstract, p. 451 |
| S64 | Kumar, 2016 | Paper-level reference |
| S65 | Neta, 2015 | Paper-level reference |
| S66 | Neta, 2019 | Abstract, p. 179 |
| S67 | McCain, 2012 | Abstract, p. 357 |
| S68 | Sylvan & Lord, 2019 | Authors’ abstract; §2.2, pp. 148–150 |
| S69 | Silva, 2015 | Paper-level reference |
| S77 | Dehaene & Naccache, 2001 | §6.2, p. 30 |
| S78 | Gaertner et al., 1989 | Abstract, p. 239 |
| S79 | Laurenceau et al., 1998 | Discussion, p. 1247 |
| S80 | Batson et al., 1995 | Abstract, p. 1042 |
| S81 | Levinas, 1961/1969 | “Ethics and the face,” p. 198 |
| S82 | Uhlmann et al., 2015 | Abstract, p. 72 |
| S83 | Haidt, 2001 | Central claim, p. 817 |
| S84 | Crimston et al., 2016 | Abstract, p. 636 |