NDT reader resources

Sources and reading

Project bibliography

Find publications cited in NDT’s reader documents and comparison records, or follow a source identifier to its publication and passage.

Read online or download the bibliography.
Publication entries combine repeated references to the same work. Additional reading is included where a lineage or comparison needs context.

Open bibliography PDF
81 works

Publications and selected reading

Inclusion identifies a source, not agreement with its conclusions or proof of NDT’s claims. Passage-level references remain available in the source crosswalk below.

  1. Beal, B. L. (2018). Raskolnikov’s confession: A Dostoevskian model of moral psychology [Doctoral dissertation, Emory University].

    Open source ↗
  2. Beal, B. (2020). What are the irreducible basic elements of morality? A critique of the debate over monism and pluralism in moral psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 273–290.

    Open source ↗
  3. Beal, B. (2021). The nonmoral conditions of moral cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 34(8), 1097–1124.

    Open source ↗
  4. Beal, B., & Gogia, G. (2021). Cognition in moral space: A minimal model. Consciousness and Cognition, 92, Article 103134.

    Open source ↗
  5. Beal, B. (2022). The polyphony principle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, Article e222.

    Open source ↗
  6. Beal, B., & Rottman, J. (2024). Nonmoral beliefs are better predictors of moral judgments than moral values [Submitted manuscript; project-held version].

    Open source ↗
  7. Beal, B. (2025a, January 20). The is-to-ought model of moral cognition. Bree’s Substack.

    Open source ↗
  8. Beal, B. (2025b, January 31). On the relation between moral philosophy and moral psychology. Bree’s Substack.

    Open source ↗
  9. Beal, B. (2026). A thousand Ramanujans. Bree’s Substack.

    Open source ↗
  10. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Basil Blackwell. Cited passage: §33, p. 60.

    Open source ↗
  11. Aquinas, T. (1920). Summa theologiae (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). New Advent, online reproduction. Cited passage: I–II, question 94, article 2.

    Open source ↗
  12. Aristotle. (n.d.-a). On the motion of animals [De motu animalium] (A. S. L. Farquharson, Trans.). Internet Classics Archive. Cited passage: part 7.

    Open source ↗
  13. Aristotle. (n.d.-b). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Online text hosted by Boston University. Cited passages: books I–II.

    Open source ↗
  14. Arpaly, N. (2003). Unprincipled virtue: An inquiry into moral agency. Oxford University Press. Cited chapter: “Moral worth,” pp. 67–116.

    Open source ↗
  15. Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1157–1188.

    Open source ↗
  16. Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., Askell, A., Kernion, J., Jones, A., Chen, A., Goldie, A., Mirhoseini, A., McKinnon, C., Chen, C., Olsson, C., Olah, C., Hernandez, D., Drain, D., Ganguli, D., Li, D., Tran-Johnson, E., Perez, E., … Kaplan, J. (2022). Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI feedback [Preprint]. arXiv.

    Open source ↗
  17. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

    Open source ↗
  18. Batson, C. D., Klein, T. R., Highberger, L., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1042–1054.

    Open source ↗
  19. Bentham, J. (n.d.). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. University of Texas at Austin, online text. Cited passage: chapter I, §II.

    Open source ↗
  20. Crimston, D., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653.

    Open source ↗
  21. Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69.

    Open source ↗
  22. Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1052–1075.

    Open source ↗
  23. Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without principles. Oxford University Press.

    Open source ↗
  24. Davidson, D. (2006). Intending. In E. Lepore & K. Ludwig (Eds.), The essential Davidson (pp. 122–137). Oxford University Press. (Original essay published 1978.)

    Open source ↗
  25. Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1–2), 1–37.

    Open source ↗
  26. Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429–452.

    Open source ↗
  27. Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2), 321–357.

    Open source ↗
  28. Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., & Pezzulo, G. (2017). Active inference: A process theory. Neural Computation, 29(1), 1–49.

    Open source ↗
  29. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 239–249.

    Open source ↗
  30. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development (with a new letter to readers). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1982.)

    Open source ↗
  31. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press.

    Open source ↗
  32. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.

    Open source ↗
  33. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619.

    Open source ↗
  34. Gray, K., & Pratt, S. (2025). Morality in our mind and across cultures and politics. Annual Review of Psychology, 76, 663–691.

    Open source ↗
  35. Gray, K., MacCormack, J. K., Henry, T., Banks, E., Schein, C., Armstrong-Carter, E., Abrams, S., & Muscatell, K. A. (2022). The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(6), 1199–1222.

    Open source ↗
  36. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Open source ↗
  37. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.

    Open source ↗
  38. Halpern, J. Y., & Pearl, J. (2005). Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(4), 843–887.

    Open source ↗
  39. Hart, H. L. A., & Honoré, T. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Open source ↗
  40. Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time: A revised edition of the Stambaugh translation (J. Stambaugh, Trans.; D. J. Schmidt, Rev. & Foreword). State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1927.)

    Open source ↗
  41. Held, V. (1995). The meshing of care and justice. Hypatia, 10(2), 128–132.

    Open source ↗
  42. Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., Critch, A., Li, J., Song, D., & Steinhardt, J. (2021). Aligning AI with shared human values. International Conference on Learning Representations. arXiv:2008.02275.

    Open source ↗
  43. Herman, B. (1993). The practice of moral judgment. Harvard University Press. Cited chapter: “On the value of acting from the motive of duty,” pp. 1–22.

    Open source ↗
  44. Horty, J. F. (2012). Reasons as defaults. Oxford University Press.

    Open source ↗
  45. Hume, D. (n.d.). A treatise of human nature. Hume Texts Online. Cited passages: 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.8, and 3.1.1.27; SBN pp. 414, 417, and 469–470.

    Open source ↗
  46. Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (A. W. Wood, Ed. & Trans.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1785.)

    Open source ↗

    Kant, I. (2012). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor & J. Timmermann, Eds. & Trans.; 2nd ed.; C. M. Korsgaard, Introduction). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785.)

    Open source ↗
  47. Kleiman-Weiner, M., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017). Learning a commonsense moral theory. Cognition, 167, 107–123.

    Open source ↗
  48. Kumar, V. (2016). The empirical identity of moral judgment. The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(265), 783–804.

    Open source ↗
  49. Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251.

    Open source ↗
  50. Levinas, E. (1991). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. (French original published 1961; English translation first published 1969.) Cited section: “Ethics and the face,” p. 198.

    Open source ↗
  51. Levine, S., Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Cushman, F. (2026). Resource-rational contractualism: A triple theory of moral cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 49, Article e133.

    Open source ↗
  52. Lord, E., & Sylvan, K. (2020). Prime time (for the basing relation). In J. A. Carter & P. Bondy (Eds.), Well-founded belief: New essays on the epistemic basing relation (pp. 141–173). Routledge.

    Open source ↗
  53. Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Penguin Books. Cited passage: chapter 1, §2, p. 17.

    Open source ↗
  54. Makinson, D., & van der Torre, L. (2007). What is input/output logic? Input/output logic, constraints, permissions. In G. Boella, L. van der Torre, & H. Verhagen (Eds.), Normative multi-agent systems (Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Vol. 07122, pp. 1–12). Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.

    Open source ↗
  55. Markovits, J. (2010). Acting for the right reasons. The Philosophical Review, 119(2), 201–242.

    Open source ↗
  56. McCain, K. (2012). The interventionist account of causation and the basing relation. Philosophical Studies, 159(3), 357–382.

    Open source ↗
  57. Much, N. C., & Shweder, R. A. (1978). Speaking of rules: The analysis of culture in breach. In W. Damon (Ed.), New directions in child development (pp. 19–39). Jossey-Bass.

    Author’s bibliography identifying the chapter ↗
  58. Neta, R. (2015). Basing is conjuring. Minds Online.

    Open source ↗
  59. Neta, R. (2019). The basing relation. The Philosophical Review, 128(2), 179–217.

    Open source ↗
  60. Nichols, S. (2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84(2), 221–236.

    Open source ↗
  61. Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 481–518.

    Open source ↗
  62. Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75.

    Open source ↗
  63. Ramezani, A., & Xu, Y. (2025). Moral association graph: A cognitive model for automated moral inference. Topics in Cognitive Science, 17(1), 120–138.

    Open source ↗
  64. Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Clarendon Press. Cited passage: chapter 2, p. 28.

    Open source ↗
  65. Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cited passage: chapter 5, p. 189.

    Open source ↗
  66. Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70.

    Open source ↗
  67. Searle, J. R. (1964). How to derive “ought” from “is.” The Philosophical Review, 73(1), 43–58.

    Open source ↗
  68. Shweder, R. A. (1992). Ghost busters in anthropology. In R. G. D’Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 45–58). Cambridge University Press.

    Open source ↗
  69. Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). University of Chicago Press.

    Open source ↗
  70. Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–172). Routledge.

    Open source ↗
  71. Silva, P., Jr. (2015). Does doxastic justification have a basing requirement? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(2), 371–387.

    Open source ↗
  72. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Wheatley, T. (2014). Are moral judgments unified? Philosophical Psychology, 27(4), 451–474.

    Open source ↗
  73. Sliwa, P. (2016). Moral worth and moral knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(2), 393–418.

    Open source ↗
  74. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.

    Open source ↗
  75. Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81.

    Open source ↗
  76. Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). The importance of moral construal: Moral versus non-moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions. PLOS ONE, 7(11), Article e48693.

    Open source ↗
  77. Wainryb, C. (2004). “Is” and “ought”: Moral judgments about the world as understood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(103), 3–18.

    Open source ↗
  78. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Basil Blackwell. Cited passages: §§65–67.

    German text, later collected edition ↗
  79. Wright, R. W. (1985). Causation in tort law. California Law Review, 73(6), 1735–1828.

    Open source ↗
  80. Austin, M. W. (n.d.). Divine command theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Cited section: §4d. Retrieved September 7, 2026.

    Open source ↗
  81. Mack, E. (2026, June 3). Robert Nozick’s political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Cited section: §2. Retrieved September 7, 2026.

    Open source ↗
Source crosswalk · 77 passage-level source records

A source identifier refers to a particular quotation or claim in the project’s comparison records. Several identifiers can therefore lead to the same publication. Additional contextual reading does not create new comparison records.

SourcePublicationPassage or location
S01Aristotle, n.d.-aPart 7
S02Hume, n.d.-a2.3.3.3; SBN p. 414
S03Makinson & van der Torre, 2007Paper-level reference
S04Searle, 1964Paper-level reference
S05Dung, 1995-aDefinition 20, p. 329
S06Bentham, n.d.Chapter I, §II
S07Kant, n.d.Formula of Humanity; Academy 4:429
S08Ross, 1930Chapter 2, p. 28
S09Aristotle, n.d.-bBooks I–II
S10Held, 1995Paper-level reference
S11Scanlon, 1998Chapter 5, p. 189
S12Mack, 2026§2
S13Aquinas, n.d.I–II, question 94, article 2
S14IEP, Divine Command Theory§4d; secondary account of Adams
S15Dancy, 2004Chapter 1, p. 7
S16Graham et al., 2011p. 366
S17Schein & Gray, 2018-ap. 32
S18Turiel, 1983-aChapter 4, p. 61
S19Curry, Mullins & Whitehouse, 2019Paper-level reference
S20Rai & Fiske, 2011-ap. 58
S21Kleiman-Weiner, Saxe & Tenenbaum, 2017Author manuscript, p. 2
S22Friston et al., 2017Paper-level reference
S23Bai et al., 2022Preprint-level reference
S24Hendrycks et al., 2021Paper-level reference
S25Beal, 2020Article-level reference
S26Beal, 2021Article-level reference
S27Beal & Gogia, 2021Article-level reference
S28Beal, 2022Commentary-level reference
S29Beal, 2018Dissertation-level reference
S30Beal, 2025aEssay-level reference
S31Beal, 2025bEssay-level reference
S32Beal, 2026Essay-level reference
S33Herman, 1993“On the value of acting from the motive of duty,” p. 21
S34Arpaly, 2003“Moral worth,” p. 72
S35Markovits, 2010p. 202
S36Sliwa, 2016p. 393
S37Hart & Honore, 1985Book-level reference
S38Wright, 1985p. 1774
S39Halpern & Pearl, 2005Paper-level reference
S40Levine et al., 2026Manuscript, p. 13
S41Ramezani & Xu, 2025-ap. 120
S42Pollock, 1987p. 484
S43Horty, 2012Publisher abstract
S44Bakhtin, 1984Chapter 1, p. 6
S45Mackie, 1977Chapter 1, §2, p. 17
S46Anscombe, 1957§33, p. 60
S47Davidson, 19782006 collection, p. 132; original essay 1978
S48Hume, n.d.-b3.1.1.27; SBN pp. 469–470
S49Hume, n.d.-c2.3.3.8; SBN p. 417
S50Haidt & Joseph, 2004p. 60
S51Graham et al., 2013p. 63
S52Schein & Gray, 2018-bp. 32 (source record lists p. 33)
S53Turiel, 1983-bChapter 4, p. 64
S54Rai & Fiske, 2011-bp. 58
S55Ramezani & Xu, 2025-b§5.1
S56Dung, 1995-bDefinition 7, p. 327
S57Kant, 1785Section I, shopkeeper; Academy 4:397
S58Nichols, 2002Paper-level reference
S59Wittgenstein, 1953§§65–67
S60Beal & Rottman, 2024Submitted manuscript, 2024
S61Cushman & Young, 2011Paper-level reference
S62Van Bavel et al., 2012Paper-level reference
S63Sinnott-Armstrong & Wheatley, 2014Abstract, p. 451
S64Kumar, 2016Paper-level reference
S65Neta, 2015Paper-level reference
S66Neta, 2019Abstract, p. 179
S67McCain, 2012Abstract, p. 357
S68Sylvan & Lord, 2019Authors’ abstract; §2.2, pp. 148–150
S69Silva, 2015Paper-level reference
S77Dehaene & Naccache, 2001§6.2, p. 30
S78Gaertner et al., 1989Abstract, p. 239
S79Laurenceau et al., 1998Discussion, p. 1247
S80Batson et al., 1995Abstract, p. 1042
S81Levinas, 1961/1969“Ethics and the face,” p. 198
S82Uhlmann et al., 2015Abstract, p. 72
S83Haidt, 2001Central claim, p. 817
S84Crimston et al., 2016Abstract, p. 636